TNReady Grades 6-8 Narrative Rubric
The TN TNReady Grades 6-8 Narrative Rubric scored out of 16 points across 4 criteria, for narrative writing at grades 6-8. Published by Tennessee Department of Education.
How it is scored
- Focus & Organization4 pts · 4 levels
- Development4 pts · 4 levels
- Language4 pts · 4 levels
- Conventions4 pts · 4 levels
Score an essay against this rubric in the grader. Free account, 20 essays a month.
The full rubric
Focus & Organization · 4 points
4 points
In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • effectively establishes a relevant context and point of view to engage and orient the reader and introduces a narrator and/or characters. • utilizes effective organizational strategies to establish a sequence of events and/or experiences that unfold naturally and logically, creating a smooth progression. • contains an effective conclusion that reflects on the narrated experiences or events.
3 points
In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • adequately establishes a relevant context and point of view to engage and orient the reader and introduces a narrator and/or characters. • utilizes adequate organizational strategies to establish a sequence of events and/or experiences that unfold naturally and logically, creating a smooth progression. • contains an adequate conclusion that reflects on the narrated experiences or events.
2 points
In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • conveys a limited, possibly confusing context and point of view that may include a narrator and/or characters. • contains a limited sequence of events and/or experiences that may be confusing or contain gaps that interfere with the natural flow of events and/or experiences. • contains a weak conclusion that may be only loosely related to the narrated events or experiences.
1 point
In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • contains an unclear, irrelevant, or no context or point of view. • contains no or an ineffective sequence of events and/or experiences that may be brief, confusing, or very hard to follow. • contains no or an irrelevant conclusion.
Development · 4 points
4 points
In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • effectively utilizes relevant narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, to thoroughly develop experiences, events, and/or characters. • effectively incorporates relevant, well-chosen details from the stimulus. • effectively demonstrates a clear understanding of the task and stimulus by using relevant, well-chosen, descriptive details in order to convey a precise picture of the experiences, events, and/or characters.
3 points
In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • adequately utilizes relevant narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, in order to sufficiently develop experiences, events, and/or characters. • adequately incorporates relevant details from the stimulus. • adequately demonstrates an understanding of the task and stimulus by using relevant descriptive details in order to convey a precise picture of the experiences, events, and/or characters.
2 points
In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • utilizes some relevant narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, in order to partially develop experiences, events, and/or characters. • utilizes limited, if any, relevant details from the stimulus. • demonstrates some understanding of the task and stimulus by using some relevant details in order to convey a limited picture of the experiences, events, and/or characters.
1 point
In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • contains few or no relevant narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, in order to develop experiences, events and/or characters. • contains no or irrelevant details from the stimulus. • demonstrates little to no understanding of the task and stimulus by using no or irrelevant details, conveying an unclear or no picture of the experiences, events, and/or characters.
Language · 4 points
4 points
The writing: • illustrates consistent and sophisticated command of precise language, including sensory language, appropriate to the task. • illustrates sophisticated command of syntactic variety for meaning and reader interest. • utilizes sophisticated and varied transitional words and phrases.
3 points
The writing: • illustrates consistent command of precise language, including sensory language, appropriate to the task. • illustrates consistent command of syntactic variety for meaning and reader interest. • utilizes appropriate and varied transitional words and phrases.
2 points
The writing: • illustrates inconsistent command of precise and/or sensory language. • illustrates inconsistent command of syntactic variety. • utilizes basic or repetitive transitional words and phrases.
1 point
The writing: • illustrates little to no use of precise and/or sensory language. • illustrates little to no syntactic variety. • utilizes no or few transitional words and phrases.
Conventions · 4 points
4 points
The writing: • demonstrates consistent and sophisticated command of grade-level conventions of standard written English. • may contain a few minor errors that do not interfere with meaning.
3 points
The writing: • demonstrates consistent command of grade-level conventions of standard written English. • contains occasional minor and/or major errors, but the errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
2 points
The writing: • demonstrates inconsistent command of grade-level conventions of standard written English. • contains frequent errors that may significantly interfere with meaning.
1 point
The writing: • demonstrates limited command of grade-level conventions of standard written English. • contains numerous and repeated errors that seriously impede meaning.
Source
Tennessee Department of Education. Official document. Rubrics are revised periodically, so check the source before using this for a graded assessment.
Score an essay against this rubric
This rubric is built into the essay grader. Upload an essay, typed or handwritten, and get a score on every criterion with the reasoning written out. You can change any score before it goes back to the student.
Grade an essay against this rubricFree account, 20 essays a month.
Related rubrics
- NJSLA-A Grades 6–8 Argumentative Rubric
- NJSLA-A Grades 6–8 Informative and Explanatory Rubric
- NJSLA-A Grades 6–8 Narrative Rubric
- NJSLA-A Grade 9 and NJGPA-A Argumentative Rubric
- STAAR Grades 6-8 Extended Constructed Response (ECR) — Argumentative/Opinion Writing Rubric
- Smarter Balanced Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6-11)