All writing rubrics · Tennessee writing rubrics

TNReady Grades 6-8 Narrative Rubric

TNReady Grades 6-8 Narrative Rubric is a 16-point scoring rubric published by Tennessee Department of Education: it scores narrative writing at grades 6-8 on 4 criteria, Focus & Organization (4 points), Development (4 points), Language (4 points) and Conventions (4 points), and scores run from 4 to 16.

Grades 6-816 points total4 criteriaTNState assessment rubrics
Download the printable PDF

3 pages, US Letter, black and white. Free, no account, no email. Includes every performance level and a blank scoring sheet.

How it is scored

  • Focus & Organization4 pts · 4 levels
  • Development4 pts · 4 levels
  • Language4 pts · 4 levels
  • Conventions4 pts · 4 levels

Score an essay against this rubric in the grader. Free account, 20 essays.

The full rubric

Focus & Organization · 4 points

4 points

In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • effectively establishes a relevant context and point of view to engage and orient the reader and introduces a narrator and/or characters. • utilizes effective organizational strategies to establish a sequence of events and/or experiences that unfold naturally and logically, creating a smooth progression. • contains an effective conclusion that reflects on the narrated experiences or events.

3 points

In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • adequately establishes a relevant context and point of view to engage and orient the reader and introduces a narrator and/or characters. • utilizes adequate organizational strategies to establish a sequence of events and/or experiences that unfold naturally and logically, creating a smooth progression. • contains an adequate conclusion that reflects on the narrated experiences or events.

2 points

In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • conveys a limited, possibly confusing context and point of view that may include a narrator and/or characters. • contains a limited sequence of events and/or experiences that may be confusing or contain gaps that interfere with the natural flow of events and/or experiences. • contains a weak conclusion that may be only loosely related to the narrated events or experiences.

1 point

In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • contains an unclear, irrelevant, or no context or point of view. • contains no or an ineffective sequence of events and/or experiences that may be brief, confusing, or very hard to follow. • contains no or an irrelevant conclusion.

Development · 4 points

4 points

In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • effectively utilizes relevant narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, to thoroughly develop experiences, events, and/or characters. • effectively incorporates relevant, well-chosen details from the stimulus. • effectively demonstrates a clear understanding of the task and stimulus by using relevant, well-chosen, descriptive details in order to convey a precise picture of the experiences, events, and/or characters.

3 points

In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • adequately utilizes relevant narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, in order to sufficiently develop experiences, events, and/or characters. • adequately incorporates relevant details from the stimulus. • adequately demonstrates an understanding of the task and stimulus by using relevant descriptive details in order to convey a precise picture of the experiences, events, and/or characters.

2 points

In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • utilizes some relevant narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, in order to partially develop experiences, events, and/or characters. • utilizes limited, if any, relevant details from the stimulus. • demonstrates some understanding of the task and stimulus by using some relevant details in order to convey a limited picture of the experiences, events, and/or characters.

1 point

In response to the task and the stimulus, the writing: • contains few or no relevant narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, in order to develop experiences, events and/or characters. • contains no or irrelevant details from the stimulus. • demonstrates little to no understanding of the task and stimulus by using no or irrelevant details, conveying an unclear or no picture of the experiences, events, and/or characters.

Language · 4 points

4 points

The writing: • illustrates consistent and sophisticated command of precise language, including sensory language, appropriate to the task. • illustrates sophisticated command of syntactic variety for meaning and reader interest. • utilizes sophisticated and varied transitional words and phrases.

3 points

The writing: • illustrates consistent command of precise language, including sensory language, appropriate to the task. • illustrates consistent command of syntactic variety for meaning and reader interest. • utilizes appropriate and varied transitional words and phrases.

2 points

The writing: • illustrates inconsistent command of precise and/or sensory language. • illustrates inconsistent command of syntactic variety. • utilizes basic or repetitive transitional words and phrases.

1 point

The writing: • illustrates little to no use of precise and/or sensory language. • illustrates little to no syntactic variety. • utilizes no or few transitional words and phrases.

Conventions · 4 points

4 points

The writing: • demonstrates consistent and sophisticated command of grade-level conventions of standard written English. • may contain a few minor errors that do not interfere with meaning.

3 points

The writing: • demonstrates consistent command of grade-level conventions of standard written English. • contains occasional minor and/or major errors, but the errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.

2 points

The writing: • demonstrates inconsistent command of grade-level conventions of standard written English. • contains frequent errors that may significantly interfere with meaning.

1 point

The writing: • demonstrates limited command of grade-level conventions of standard written English. • contains numerous and repeated errors that seriously impede meaning.

Source

Tennessee Department of Education. Official document. Rubrics are revised periodically, so check the source before using this for a graded assessment.

Common questions

What does the TCAP Writing Narrative rubric for Grades 6-8 score?

It scores narrative writing at grades 6-8 on 4 criteria: Focus & Organization (4 points), Development (4 points), Language (4 points) and Conventions (4 points). Each criterion has 4 performance levels, and every level descriptor is written out on this page.

What is the top score on the TCAP Writing Narrative rubric for Grades 6-8?

16 points. The criteria are weighted Focus & Organization (4 points), Development (4 points), Language (4 points) and Conventions (4 points), so scores run from 4 to 16.

Who publishes the TCAP Writing Narrative rubric for Grades 6-8?

Tennessee Department of Education. The official document is linked in the Source section of this page. Rubrics are revised periodically, so check the source before using this for a graded assessment.

Can NudgeLearn grade essays with the TCAP Writing Narrative rubric for Grades 6-8?

Yes. This rubric is built into the NudgeLearn essay grader. Upload an essay, typed or handwritten, and it comes back with a score on every criterion and the reasoning written out. The teacher stays the grader: review it and change any score before it goes back to the student. A free account covers 20 essays.

Grading against this rubric

The essay grader is measured on 78 real student essays that Texas released with official examiner scores: nine in ten came back within one point of the examiner. That study used the STAAR rubrics, not this one. The accuracy study: method, numbers and limits.

How to grade constructed responses for a whole class: short and extended constructed responses, scored consistently across a class set.

Score an essay against this rubric

This rubric is built into the essay grader. Upload an essay, typed or handwritten, and get a score on every criterion with the reasoning written out. You can change any score before it goes back to the student.

Grade an essay against this rubric

Free account, 20 essays.