Smarter Balanced Narrative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 3-8)
The SBAC Smarter Balanced Narrative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 3-8) scored out of 10 points across 3 criteria, for narrative writing at grades 3-8. Published by Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium.
How it is scored
- Organization/Purpose4 pts · 4 levels
- Development/Elaboration4 pts · 4 levels
- Conventions2 pts · 3 levels
The full rubric
Organization/Purpose · 4 points
4 points
The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, is fully sustained and the focus is clear and maintained throughout: an effective plot helps to create a sense of unity and completeness; effectively establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view*; consistent use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between and among ideas; strong connection between and among ideas; natural, logical sequence of events from beginning to end; effective opening and closure for audience and purpose.
3 points
The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, is adequately sustained, and the focus is adequate and generally maintained: an evident plot helps to create a sense of unity and completeness, though there may be minor flaws and some ideas may be loosely connected; adequately establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view*; adequate use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between and among ideas; adequate sequence of events from beginning to end; adequate opening and closure for audience and purpose.
2 points
The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, is somewhat sustained and may have an uneven focus: there may be an inconsistent plot, and/or flaws may be evident; unevenly or minimally establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view*; uneven use of appropriate transitional strategies and/or little variety; weak or uneven sequence of events; opening and closure, if present, are weak.
1 point
The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, may be maintained but may provide little or no focus: there is little or no discernible plot or there may just be a series of events; may be brief or there is little to no attempt to establish a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view*; few or no appropriate transitional strategies may be evident and may cause confusion; little or no organization of an event sequence; frequent extraneous ideas and/or a major drift may be evident; opening and/or closure may be missing or unsatisfactory.
Development/Elaboration · 4 points
4 points
The narrative, real or imagined, provides thorough, effective elaboration using relevant details, dialogue, and/or description: experiences, characters, setting and/or events are clearly developed; connections to source materials may enhance the narrative; effective use of a variety of narrative techniques that advance the story or illustrate the experience; effective use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that clearly advances the purpose; effective, appropriate style enhances the narration.
3 points
The narrative, real or imagined, provides adequate elaboration using details, dialogue, and/or description: experiences, characters, setting, and/or events are adequately developed; connections to source materials may contribute to the narrative; adequate use of a variety of narrative techniques that generally advance the story or illustrate the experience; adequate use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that generally advances the purpose; generally appropriate style is evident.
2 points
The narrative, real or imagined, provides uneven, cursory elaboration using partial and uneven details, dialogue, and/or description: experiences, characters, setting, and/or events are unevenly developed; connections to source materials may be ineffective, awkward, or vague but do not interfere with the narrative; narrative techniques are uneven and inconsistent; partial or weak use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that may not advance the purpose; inconsistent or weak attempt to create appropriate style.
1 point
The narrative, real or imagined, provides minimal elaboration using few or no details, dialogue, and/or description: experiences, characters, setting, and/or events may be vague, lack clarity, or confusing; connections to source materials, if evident, may detract from the narrative; use of narrative techniques may be minimal, absent, incorrect, or irrelevant; may have little or no use of sensory, concrete, or figurative language; language does not advance and may interfere with the purpose; little or no evidence of appropriate style.
Conventions · 2 points
2 points
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions: adequate use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling.
1 point
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions: limited use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling.
0 points
The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions: infrequent use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling.
Source
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Official document. Rubrics are revised periodically, so check the source before using this for a graded assessment.
Score an essay against this rubric
This rubric is built into the essay grader. Upload an essay, typed or handwritten, and get a score on every criterion with the reasoning written out. You can change any score before it goes back to the student.
Grade an essayRelated rubrics
- NJSLA-A Grades 6–8 Argumentative Rubric
- NJSLA-A Grades 6–8 Informative and Explanatory Rubric
- NJSLA-A Grades 6–8 Narrative Rubric
- NJSLA-A Grade 9 and NJGPA-A Argumentative Rubric
- STAAR Grades 6-8 Extended Constructed Response (ECR) — Argumentative/Opinion Writing Rubric
- Smarter Balanced Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6-11)